Articles submitted to the journal must not have been published elsewhere or submitted for publication.  If the manuscripts sent to more than one journal for evaluation at the same time are detected, the evaluation and publication processes in our journal will be stopped.

The candidate article sent to the journal is firstly pre-reviewed by the secretariat and examined in terms of compliance with the rules of publication and spelling, and then directed to the chief editor for the appointment of a field editor. Candidate articles that do not comply with the publication and writing rules are returned to the authors.
Manuscripts submitted to the journal are first formally examined by the editor and field editors (editorial board) who are responsible for all processes in terms of publication policy and rules, and those decided to be appropriate are sent to referees related to the field. If necessary, the manuscripts are sent to the authors for revision or suggested corrections in line with the criticisms and suggestions of the referees.

Two referees are appointed for the manuscript that is reviewed by the field editor and decided to be evaluated in the journal. In case the two referees make different evaluations, a third referee is appointed. Authors resubmit their manuscripts to the journal by taking into account the corrections and suggestions specified in the referee evaluation form.
The editors of the journal decide on the publication of the articles in which the corrections and suggestions are made in line with the referees' opinions.  The articles that are decided to be published are sent to the author(s) for final review.

The journal uses a double-blind refereeing system in which the names of the referees and authors are kept confidential at every stage of the process.